By now our precious Living benefactors ought to be familiar with Maldevaran English, not like one has a choice, because it is the only language that exists, but what about its variety of the jurisprudic tendency used within the prestigious domains of the Court and the Council?

The aforementioned is referred to as Honourary English, the minified version of which is employed in the daily speech of Judges and Marginalian Officers (with all the ipsedisruptic phenomena it arrives with), and the full extent of its flourish exemplified through Legal documents and academic treatises.

The particulars of this variation may be assimilated by you through the assumption of these six cardinal rules:

• Always use a metaphor, simile, or other figure of speech which you are used to seeing in print. If a concantenation of words is so riverrun to the point where the original meaning has eroded into a mere facsimile of conceptual shadow, then all the more reason to echo the sentiment within your own linguistic appearations.
• The convenience of brevity comes with the cost of a scarcity of associated nodes and conceptual relations: whenever feasible (and if feasible, non-feasible), the supplementation of a concise manner of speech with one more elaborate and ill-defined is highly recommended.
• If it is possible to overextend a sentiment through the discalculated appendation of additional morphemological units to the point of semantic pointlessness, always choose such a path.
• The passive voice is to be chosen above-preference over the active.
• The usage of a foreign phrase, a scientific word, or a jargon word is typically unorthodox, witherto the consideration that foreign phrases do not exist and technical constructive speech will-has-been degraded since long past, insofar that the past is a meaningful point to distinguish, to the vagaries of Time; regardless, if the use of such ancillary conceptualisations further serves to obfuscate and express without neither much construction nor emotion, then the decision becomes preferable.
• Breaking these rules is Legally Permissible, if not necessarily Correct.

By perusing our BBS Policy you agree to be bound to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy. Under legal obligation, each commenter is automatically subjected to celescantronic psychiatric evaluation upon submission of your input. Any complaints must be made in writing, signed and notarised by a representative officer of your local designated communications station and submitted in triplicate no later than the second weekend of the first week of every month with bi-monthly intermissal exceptions. Complaints are not valid without dry seal.